Monday, August 1, 2011

10 Ways to Get Americans Spending Again



By PHILIP MOELLER

Posted: July 29, 2011

Despite years of near-zero interest rates and government stimulus programs, American consumers have not recovered their spending appetites. They are still reeling from big mortgage and other debts, facing stagnant wages and long-term unemployment, and desperately seeking reasons to once again believe in the American Dream.

[See 10 Smart Ways to Improve Your Budget.]

Since consumer spending is responsible for more than two-thirds of U.S. economic activity, employers are reluctant to hire people until they see more demand. So while corporate profits continue to soar, those trillions of booked earnings stay on the sidelines while economic growth sputters.

Many of the most impartial judges of the U.S. economy and government fiscal policy can be found overseas, in governments and financial institutions, and among the many organizations that hold half of our public debt. They have a big stake in U.S. financial stability. And they're not running for elective office in the United States in 2012.

For the most part, our foreign creditors want to see evidence that the United States is on a sustainable path toward meaningful reductions in annual government deficits. If this evidence was coupled with more short-term stimulus, their reaction would be, for the most part, favorable. But any short-term stimulus must be part of a longer-term plan—a binding plan—to reduce deficits.

In a recent overview of the U.S. economy, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) listed two main concerns about the country's fiscal condition and deficit fight. One was default. The second was steep spending cuts, or what the IMF described as "an excessively large upfront fiscal adjustment that would significantly weaken domestic demand." Sorry, that's the way economists write.

"A politically-backed medium-term framework that raises revenues and addresses long-term expenditure pressures should be the cornerstone of fiscal stabilization," the IMF said in the report.

[See 9 Ways to Avoid Online Scams.]

Here are 10 ideas that have been widely suggested by economists and others to get consumers back into the game. Don't expect to find quick fixes. As the nasty debt-ceiling fight shows all too well, the United States has run out of easy solutions. Also, many ideas involve short-term increases in government spending. Maybe this seems like a non-starter. Many people think horrendous deficits are what got us into this fix in the first place. There is an enormous gap between liberal and conservative thought here, and it's not going away. Increasingly, however, many fiscal experts have come to believe that government stimulus programs of the past two years were too small and not effectively targeted to create a lot of new jobs. The failure of those stimulus efforts does not, by itself, mean that stimulus programs don't work.

1. Boost consumer confidence. The very public food fight between Republicans and Democrats has been terribly damaging to public confidence. Our "leaders" need to discuss their differences in less hostile ways, reach a solution, and give Americans some reason to trust that their national government has their best interests at heart. Even if sharp differences remain, Congress and the White House should abandon their scorched-earth politics.

2. Agree on a long-term deficit reduction plan. Yes, this is a no-brainer. But we haven't seen one yet. To be credible, the plan must address healthcare and other entitlement programs. Don't expect seniors to applaud fiscal restraint that comes at their expense. But they know cuts are coming and will accept them, particularly if accompanied by higher taxes on wealthier Americans. Shared sacrifice must be apparent.

3. Start fixing the mortgage mess. It will take years to work off the excesses of the housing bubble. But the clock won't start moving in earnest until and unless the government does a more effective job of speeding the review of troubled mortgages and helping to get them cleared off the books. These mortgages are a toxic overhang to a housing recovery, and the lack of home purchases and new-home construction is a huge drag on the economy.

4. Continue the payroll tax breaks for Social Security taxes. President Obama supports an extension through 2012 of this year's two-percentage-point reduction in the employee share of Social Security payroll taxes. The reduction reduced the tax to 4.2 percent from 6.2 percent of covered payroll, up to $106,800 in annual wages.

5. Extend unemployment benefits. Long-term unemployment is becoming a terrible legacy of the Great Recession. As more and more Americans find themselves out of work for a year or more, their financial safety nets have become shredded.

[See Credit Cards Gone Wild.]

6. Expand job-training efforts. Job skills erode quickly in a knowledge-based economy. If we want to help reduce long-term unemployment, we need to step up our efforts to refresh and enhance job skills. Many job openings now go unfilled for lack of skilled applicants.

7. Adopt a government stimulus program for public works. Much of our infrastructure is decaying and at risk of falling apart. What better time to address these needs, and will prices ever be cheaper? There is great unused capacity and labor for this work. But let's do it smartly, with strong federal-local partnerships that define high priority work that's ready to be done soon.

8. Let the government negotiate lower drug prices for Medicare beneficiaries. Medicare is not allowed to negotiate drug prices with pharmaceutical companies. Bills are regularly introduced to overturn this outdated nod to the myth of private price competition for branded prescription drugs. I guess we could all move to Canada, where drug prices are sharply lower than in the United States. But maybe there's a better way.

9. Encourage just a bit of inflation. Somewhat higher interest rates would help to get capital off the sidelines in search of more attractive returns. It also would help reassure seniors by boosting their earnings on conservative retirement investments.

10. Strengthen the dollar. Higher interest rates also should boost demand for dollar-denominated assets. This will give American consumers more buying power for imported goods. If you want consumers to spend more money, give them more money to spend. A stronger dollar fits this bill. A stronger dollar would make it harder for U.S. firms to sell their exports. But the IMF study said that strong export activity by U.S. firms has not been contributing to overall domestic economic growth.

Thursday, July 28, 2011

9 Steps to Effective Problem Solving

Problem solving is a skill that start-up founders need to learn quickly. Use these steps to guide you.

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

IRS Reports Increase in Tax Scams

There is no such thing as free money.

Let’s just go ahead and get that out of the way first thing.

Our Treasury does not have a pot of money just sitting around waiting for you to scoop it up (we’re nearly bankrupt, remember?)

And no matter what anybody tells you otherwise, tax credits, refunds and rebates are based on a set of tax-related criteria. You don’t get points on your tax return for being cute or Welsh or listening to country music.

Despite the fact that deep down we all know that you can’t get something for nothing, the IRS is seeing an increase in attempts to get taxpayers to file false claims for tax credits or rebates. These efforts – scams – are generally targeted to lower income taxpayers who might not have a filing requirement in the first place.

In particular, the IRS has noted a flurry of schemes in the South and Midwest tied to local churches. The folks that promote these schemes have been posting flyers and advertisements claiming that free money is available from the IRS. They further suggest that little or no documentation is required in order to file for large refunds and rebates. And since they are “partnering” with churches, based on false promises to the congregation and staff of the church, some taxpayers believe that the claims must be true.

A number of the schemes are targeting the elderly and low income individuals who are advised that they may be entitled to refunds based on excess Social Security benefits or payouts. Schemers are also advising taxpayers that they can transfer funds from the Social Security Administration directly to the IRS by simply filling out a form.

What do the promoters of these schemes get out of it? In some cases, these unscrupulous preparers get paid large fees upfront. In others, they may be inflating credits and deductions in exchange for a piece of a sizable refund.

Don’t be fooled. If something sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Here are some danger signs to look for:

  • Offers for tax refunds or rebates that state that no documentation is required;
  • Claims for expired credits (such as the Economic Recovery Credit Program or Recovery Rebate Credit);
  • “Reconstructed” (in other words: made up) tax forms that misstate your income;
  • Advice that suggests you exaggerate the amount of income you make in order to increase availability for tax credits;
  • Requests for bank or personal information that is not related to your taxes;
  • Large, upfront payment for services from tax preparers that appear overnight or that you’ve never heard of; and
  • Preparers who refuse to sign tax returns.

Trust your gut. If you don’t feel comfortable, walk away. A real tax professional won’t be insulted if you do – and a bogus one doesn’t deserve your business.

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Has Your Real Estate Market Hit Bottom?

Whether you're waiting to sell your house or you're waiting to buy, everyone involved in the real estate market is waiting for one thing: the bottom. Prices in most areas of the country are continuing to fall, and the Christian Science Monitor reports that experts are predicting a wide range of change. In short, they believe either prices are at bottom, or they could fall by another 20 percent.

[In Pictures: 10 Affordable Spots for Summer Vacation]

Monthly sales are also still falling. The National Association of Realtors reports that sales in May 2011 were down slightly from April, and over 15 percent down from this time last year. So how do you know if your market has hit bottom? The experts, looking at pages and pages of data, don't seem to know any more than we do. The good news is that often, we can make slightly more accurate predictions than the experts. Why? Because we know our communities. This insider information can offer valuable clues on whether or not your housing market has hit bottom.

Here are four things to look for to assess the real estate market in your city.

1. Employment Rate

Jobs are the most important factor in deciding whether or not a market has hit bottom. When people have or get jobs, they buy houses. If your community has stagnant job growth, or job layoffs looming, chances are that prices and sales will continue to fall. Keep an eye on the job market in your community. For instance, if a large company is planning to open up shop within 10 to 20 miles of your home or the community where you want to live, this could signal a spurt of growth.

If you're about to sell, you might want to wait until this company is up and running, drawing in all those employees (and flooding the community with capital). If you're waiting to buy, you might want to do so before they open, in case values go up a bit. Another signal is expansion. If major employers in your area are about to start hiring, this could be a good sign your market will start to improve.

2. Renters' Market

People typically rent houses when they can't afford to buy one. Likewise, people will rent out the houses and condos they own when nobody is buying. If you live in an area where the renters' market is up, the real estate market is down and it's probably not a great time to sell. But if you live in a market where there aren't many renters, or buying is cheaper than renting, it's a good time to sell, as people are more likely to buy homes when it's more affordable than renting (i.e. more on the debate of renting versus buying a home).

[In Pictures: 10 Smart Ways to Improve Your Budget.]

Trying to decide if you should buy? Go to Rentometer. This tool allows you to input how much you're paying for rent, and the Rentometer compares it to all the other rentals in your area. Figure out how much you'd ideally spend per month owning a home. If owning a home is cheaper, you should look at buying. However, keep in mind that you'll probably be competing with more buyers in your area.

3. Foreclosures

Foreclosed homes are bad for every neighborhood because they drag down prices, as well as prestige. Communities won't recover from the bottom until the rate of foreclosures starts to slow down. Get your hands on the foreclosure rates for your county, city, or community. If rates are slowing, this could be a good sign that you might have reached bottom. If they're holding steady or increasing, your market has not yet bottomed out.

4. Time on the Market

Nationally, it takes around nine months for a house to sell once it goes on the market. However, talk to your local real estate agents and realtors. If your community has a three to six month turnaround time, this signals not only that people are buying, but that there are fewer homes to buy. Both are very good signs for sellers! On the other hand, if houses are sitting on the market for 9 months or more, buyers will have more negotiating power, and it's a sign that the market is heading downward.

Final Thoughts

Without a doubt, we're all ready to hit the bottom of this barrel, and although experts can take educated guesses at when the real estate market will start to recover, many times we can get a more accurate look just by paying attention to what's happening in our own community. Look for clues in employment and the real estate market in your community to decide if it's a good time to buy, sell, or just stay put for a little while longer. Based on the four factors above, has the housing market in your community hit bottom yet? Or does it still have a long way to go?

Heather Levin has a passion for green living and smart money management, and writes about her experiences and best tips on Money Crashers, included in the list of top personal finance blogs online.

Thursday, July 7, 2011

COLLEGE!

Tax Tips for Sub S Corporate Structures

My article “Tax Tips for S Corporate Structure” that ran on May 20 spurred numerous e-mails from CPAs all over the country stating that I had made an error with regard to the ability to write off rental losses against Sub S income, all of which are declared on Schedule E of a person’s individual income tax return. The main concern is that rental losses are treated as passive losses, whereas Sub S income is non-passive income. You can’t mix apples and oranges: You can’t net passive losses against non-passive income.

To explain the concept simplistically: Passive income is income you receive while sitting around, such as interest from a savings account, dividends from stock holdings, or rents from apartment buildings. (Can’t resist the aside, you also can’t write off rental losses against dividend or interest income even though they are in the same class of income.)

For those of you who get up every day and go to work at your Sub S Corporate business where you sweat and struggle to claw your way to the top, you’re not thinking that it’s “sitting around income.” This has got to be non-passive income, right?

Well… Please note: this is one of the advantages of incorporating as a Sub S Corporation. Sub S corporation income and losses are treated as passive for tax purposes. Yes, this is counterintuitive, especially if the shareholder in question also has W2 wages and material participation in the entity. Material participation – that pretty much means you go to work every day.

No one ever said the IRS is always logical.

But still, I wondered if I had missed something in my research. And because tax law is so complicated, I decided to get to the bottom of it. I discussed my findings with an IRS auditor, a tax attorney, my office mate who is also an enrolled agent, as well as with an individual in the Tax Law Department at the IRS. They all agreed with me.

But the biggest tipoff is Schedule E itself. Note that rental losses are listed on page 1, line 26; Sub S income is listed on page 2, line 32. What happens next? These two totals are combined and netted out (along with several other line items on the form) on line 42 and transferred to line 17 of Form 1040. This function alone (without any reference to work-sheeting) demonstrates that the principle I outlined is in fact correct. Don’t believe me? Go to www.irs.gov, bring up Schedule E and try it yourself.

So when you, as a Sub S Shareholder, lose $25,000 on your apartment building rentals but earn $200,000 from your Sub S Corporation, you will pay taxes on $175,000. You will not have to carry forward the $25,000 loss on the apartment building and pay taxes on $200,000, after all. You’re going to save a lot of money in taxes because of this provision.

This is a useful tool for the self employed. Once income levels for sole proprietors and partners in a partnership reach the point where rental losses will no longer be allowed (or phased out) and it is otherwise time to incorporate, the Sub S election will be quite the tax-saving device. This device also comes in handy if rental losses exceed the $25,000 maximum allowed under current tax law for passive activities at lower income levels.

But before deciding to incorporate as a Sub S, check all aspects to determine if the structure will suit your needs and psychological temperament. In other words, can you keep up with the rules and the paperwork requirements? Also check with your attorney to make sure this structure is the best form to protect you legally. And check with your tax pro to determine what your tax savings will be.

Other items about Sub S Corporations not included previously:

1. Income and losses must be allocated to shareholders according to their percentage of ownership;

2. You cannot deduct losses in excess of your investment;

3. You cannot have more than 100 shareholders;

4. Each shareholder must be a permanent U.S. resident;

5. Fringe benefits for more than 2% owners are not deductible at the corporate level – you may take the appropriate deductions for fringe benefits, such as retirement plan contributions and health insurance as an adjustment to income on your individual income tax return;

6. Not all fringe benefits are deductible like they would be if the entity was a C Corporation, e.g. life insurance and disability insurance;

7. As an owner, you must take payroll before you take a distribution of profits.

Speaking of complexities with the tax law, here’s a tid bit for you regarding my recent column about casualty losses: Beginning in 2010, you may take a casualty loss deduction for drywall corrosion. This just makes me shake my head and roll my eyes.

The implementation of this exception defeats the entire premise of no deduction for slow acting damage such as corrosion, dry rot, rust, termite damage, etc. Per IRS regulations, a deductible casualty loss is caused by a sudden and unexpected occurrence. Why the hell should drywall corrosion suddenly become an exception? It doesn’t make sense and it further complicates a tax code that has become far too burdensome and complicated for the average human to comprehend.



Read more: http://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-finance/2011/06/30/tax-tips-for-sub-s-corporate-structures/#ixzz1RR6cuvrH

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Facebook Tipped to Announce Deal With Skype

Facebook has plans for an "awesome" unveiling Wednesday, according to CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who is expected to announce a partnership with Skype, the Internet video calling company.

Facebook is not saying exactly what is in store, but sources close to the companies say a Skype partnership is inevitable. The union would bring video-chat capabilities through Facebook, allowing multiple friends to talk at the same time.

Video chatting is one of the few social networking features lacking in Facebook, an omission that has become even more glaring since Google launched an application called Hangouts.

Last week, the search giant unveiled Google+, a Facebook clone designed to play catch up in the social network space. Hangouts, a feature within Google+, has received some positive feedback for making video calls easy.

Facebook is feeling the pressure from Google's latest social networking effort, which prompted the big announcement, according to some industry observers.

Representatives for Skype said they would not comment on "rumors" of a Facebook partnership.

A number of reports said that Wednesday's Facebook show could take another direction and might be a showcase for new software, including potentially a new Facebook iPad app.

However, Facebook was not ready to reveal a new music partnership with the likes of Spotify, as has been rumored, a music industry source said.



Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/07/06/facebook-tipped-to-announce-deal-with-skype/#ixzz1RL4HMQJb

Tuesday, July 5, 2011

You're Never Too Old or Too Young for Business Schoo

The profile of the typical business school applicant has changed significantly over the past decade. Once upon a time, few would contemplate applying without first having the requisite 5 to 7 years of work experience under their belts. The prevailing wisdom held that older candidates would have more to contribute to class discussions because of their substantial real-world experience.

Flash forward to today and you'll see schools taking a closer look at younger candidates, including those with no work experience. The reason for this shift is that business schools fear some applicants would attain so much success after only a few years that they would not want to go back for an M.B.A. Some candidates really are ready for business school right after graduating from college; some have started a company while in school, played a strong role in a family business, or gained relevant experiences in other areas.

[See U.S. News's rankings of Best Business Schools.]

But as more M.B.A. programs welcome younger applicants, and in some cases actively court them with programs geared toward younger students—such as Harvard Business School's 2+2 Program, Yale School of Management's three-year Silver Scholars M.B.A. Program, and the deferred enrollment option for college seniors offered by the Stanford Graduate School of Business—anyone over age 28 may feel that she or he doesn't stand a chance of getting in.

When a client asks, "Am I too old (or too young) for an M.B.A.?" I respond that it's not about chronological age. It's more about maturity, readiness, and where you are in your career. Sometimes these things can be linked to age, but that's not a certainty.

Instead, think about what you want to gain from and what you can contribute to an M.B.A. program. You may be 22 but have a ton of insight to share and highly focused career goals. That would give you a leg up on the 28-year-old who is lost and just using the M.B.A. as something to fill the time.

So while I have seen posts in online business school forums that essentially tell people there is "no chance" past a certain age, and older candidates do face certain obstacles, these applicants get into the top programs every year, and can and should apply if an M.B.A. is the necessary stepping stone to advance their career. If you're contemplating business school in your mid-30s, the key is to demonstrate confidence, how you've progressed professionally, and what you've contributed on the job.

[Get advice directly from business school admissions officials.]

A 38-year-old candidate who has spent more than a decade in the same position without showing progression will have a hard time being admitted to a top M.B.A. program. This is not because of age. Rather, it is because the candidate may not demonstrated growth during that time. If you're applying to an elite school like Harvard, which values great leadership, you should've already developed terrific leadership skills. Many people with great leadership skills have achieved so much by the time they near 40 that they're not interested in going back to school.

However, if one of these people is interested and can demonstrate great achievement balanced with a legitimate need or desire to return to school, then they have a good chance. Proving that you are a strong and accomplished 40-year-old leader, and balancing that with the fact that you want to improve in order to get to the next step, is tough to pull off. That said, "old" people are admitted every season!

Younger applicants, meanwhile, have their own set of obstacles to overcome. They'll need to demonstrate to the admissions committee that they have the focus and maturity required to succeed in an M.B.A. program.

[Weigh the pros and cons of taking the GMAT in college.]

Since a huge part of the b-school classroom experience is the exchange of ideas from diverse individuals, younger candidates will also need to prove that they have enough life experience to contribute to an incoming class. Business schools are looking for authentic experience, not just students who subscribe to the Wall Street Journal. Finally, younger applicants will need to show an admissions team they have a strong reason for returning to school so soon after graduation.

Regardless of whether you are young or old, if you can achieve what is written above, you will have a good chance of getting into a program that is the right fit for you. Your age should never be the sole deciding factor of whether to apply to business school.

Sunday, July 3, 2011

Bernanke says Low Rates, Markets Agree:

Even though Quantititave Easing II (QE2) officially ends today, small cap investors should look for much of the same from the Federal Reserve under Ben Bernanke with top gainers such as Alanco Technologies (NASDAQ: ALAN), China Distance Education (NYSE: DL), (NASDAQ: CHCI), and LiveDeal (NASDAQ: LIVE) enjoying the liquidity pumped into the financial markets.

As his press conference in April, Bernanke stated that the Federal Reserve was commited to a low interest rate environment. This obviously entails that the United States is able to sell Treasury bonds easily to underwrite the Federal budget decifit. As QE2 entailed the Federal Reserve buying about $70 billion a month in Treasuries, about 70 percent of the total, the questions naturally beckons of who now will step in with QE2.

The answer: the Federal Reserve. As a result of the expansion of its balance sheet from bailing out the financial sector during The Great Recession, the Federal Reserve now has about $3 trillion in assets. This is well over $2.3 trillion more than it had in 2007. Much of it is in "toxic assets" from Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and other instutions. Obviously, these assets cannot sit on the balance sheet foreover as there are no appropriated funds from Congress backing them. The purchases were the result of bookkeeping transactions with the Federal Reserve and its regional banks, not the Federal budget process.

The price of toxic assets has risen. This has transpired due to several factors. Wall Street naturally overreacted and drove down the prices of mortgage backed securities too much. A rebound has naturally occurred. In addition, with interest rates so low the yields on these instruments now makes them very attractive. By keeping interest rates low, the Federal Reserve increases the value of the toxic assets on its balance sheet, making a sizeable profit: nice work if you can get it as "the house always wins."

By selling off the toxic and assets and letting other bonds mature and reinvesting the proceeds, the Federal Reserve can continue to underwrite the United States budget deficit and keep interest rates low. QE2 required about $70 billion monthly in Treasury bond purchases by the Federal Reserve. With $3 trilion on its books and an investor community hungry for high yields, the Fedeal Reserve can sell off its holdings at a profit to finance the purchase of Treasuries. This is a balancing act, for sure: if the Fed sells too many securities and removes too much liquidity from the banking system, interest rates will rise. It is working so far as since the ending of QE2 was announced, rates have not risen. There are political considerations too: QE2 did not commence until after the November 2010 elections. With a presidential election coming in November 2012, small cap investors can bet that the Federal Reserve will keep rates low until at least 2013.

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

5 Secret Credit Card Perks - My Money (usnews.com)

5 Secret Credit Card Perks - My Money (usnews.com)

10 Costs That Can Ruin Your Retirement Savings

It's said that what you don't know can't hurt you. No so. What you don't know can cost you, and sometimes cost dearly. Case in point: Advisers and others say there's a host of unknown costs and fees lurking inside your 401(k) plans, IRAs and other such retirement accounts. And often, those fees can make a world of difference in your overall investment returns.

Now truth be told, many an expert and firm the most famous of all being Vanguard are beating the drum about how 401(k) fee can be a drag on performance.

Many Americans are simply unaware of the fees they pay to their plan providers. More than seven in 10 (71%) 401(k) plan participants incorrectly reported that they did not pay any fees and 6% said that they did not know whether or not they pay fees, according to a recent AARP study.

Of note, AARP launched a 401(k) fee calculator on its web site that aims to help investors better understand 401(k) fees and their potential impact. You have to register to use the calculator, but it's easy. See the AARP 401(k) fee calculator here.

News Hub: 401(k) Borrowings Surge

4:05

New data show that employee borrowing from 401(k) plans in 2010 was way up over the previous year, in some cases in the high double digits. Jason Zweig examines the causes--and the consequences.

And come Jan. 1, 2012, plan sponsors will have to disclose the fees participants pay for their 401(k) plans.

But there are other lesser-known fees to consider. Case in point: An adviser with whom I am acquainted recently switched brokerage firms. And as is the custom in that world, he began asking his clients to move their accounts from the old brokerage firm to the new one. Well, as it turns out, those clients who moved their IRA accounts were whacked with two unexpected fees one was the so-called account transfer fee and another was the annual maintenance fee.

"Brokerage firms do not like having assets transferred out, so they like to create fees and charges to discourage asset transfers," said Michael J. Sommers, CPA/PFS, of Advanced Tax Strategies, PC

Advisers say the account termination and annual maintenance fees are perhaps the most common of the lesser-known fees and other examples of these costs abound. Jason Branning, a certified financial planner with Branning Wealth Management, LLC, moved his client accounts from one large custodian (firms that hold the assets that advisers manage for clients) to another some seven years ago and faced the very same fees.

Another variation on the account termination fee comes with retirement accounts that use managed-money programs, such as mutual fund wrap accounts. Often, these accounts have termination fees that must be paid prior to money being moved from the current manager to a new money manager, according to Timothy P. Bogert, CLU, ChFC, LIC, AIF.

Those fees, which are generally subtracted from the account balance prior to the transfer, might include that quarter's asset fee, management fee and custodian fee all of which are usually billed at the end of each calendar quarter.

And, depending on how the mutual funds owned in the account were purchased if they are A shares, B shares, or C shares there might be contingent deferred charges as well, Bogert said.

In some cases, those fees can catch account owners unaware. "Clients often fail to read the fine-print custodial disclosures that explain custody fees, annual maintenance fees and termination fees," said Branning. But in many cases, Branning said, these fees are unavoidable for all but the largest accounts. "There seems to be no way around the custodian assessing fees; retirement accounts require special reporting by the custodian," he said.

According to Denise Appleby, CEO and founder of RetirementDictionary.com, the fee with which most owners are familiar is the annual maintenance fee, which on average runs $35 to $50. "For an IRA with a large balance, this may seem negligible," she said. "But for a small balance for instance, someone just starting an IRA with a $5,000 contribution, a $50 maintenance fee is 1% of the account balance. This is in addition to any ticket charges and commissions charged for trades placed with the contribution. Not all custodians charge this fee, and some will waive it if the account balance is in excess of a specified amount."

10 fees that are eating up your retirement savings

According to Appleby, here are 10 of the fees that can eat away at your retirement savings:

1. Account termination fees

2. Account maintenance fees

3. Various account transfer fees

4. Roth conversion fee: This is usually charged when a traditional IRA is converted to a Roth IRA.

5. Federal fund wire fee and overnight delivery fee: For account owners who are unable to wait for regular delivery and instead choose to have the funds sent via federal fund wire, which usually means same day receipt, a fee might be charged to the IRA, as well as by the bank that receives the funds. For overnight delivery of checks, an express delivery fee might apply.

6. "Special investment" fee: According to Appleby, this fee applies to non-traditional/non-publicly traded investments such as private placements, real estate and certain limited partnerships. She said this fee can range from a few hundred dollars to more than $2,000 per year.

7. "Special investment" set-up fee: As with the special investment fee, this fee also applies to non-traditional investments that are not publicly traded. But unlike the special investment fee, it's not an ongoing fee. Such fees are usually one-time charges applied for reviewing and setting up the investment, Appleby said.

8. Form 990-T filing fee: For accounts that hold non-traditional/non-publicly traded investments, the custodian/trustee may need to file IRS Form 990-T with the to report unrelated business income. This fee can be up to a few hundred dollars.

9. Loan processing fees: Account owners who take loans from their 401(k)/403(b) or other employer plan account may be charged a loan processing fee, said Appleby.

10. Recordkeeping fee: And Appleby said small business owners with solo-K/individual-K plans may be charged a recordkeeping and filing fee of several hundred dollars, if they use the services of a recordkeeper. This is in addition to fees charged by the custodian.

While the fees are troubling, there are some things you do about it to make the costs less onerous. "We can't make the fees go away, but there may be a tax-efficient way to pay them," said Sommers. "If the account owner can be billed direct, and if allowed by the custodian, some fees may be able to be paid direct by the account owner which may have some tax benefit."

So, for instance, if the account owner is in the so-called "accumulation" phase of saving for retirement, it would also make sense to pay any allowable fees with what's called non-qualified money, money outside of the retirement accounts. "This would allow more money in the account to grow tax-deferred, Sommers said.

By contrast, if an account owner is in the distribution phase of retirement, it may make sense to have these fees paid from the qualified account, Sommers said.

Other even more obscure fees include those sometimes absorbed by the plan sponsor that effect plan participants in subtle ways. "I have come across 401(k) plan sponsors who suffered a market value adjustment because they fired the third-party administrator (TPA) and tried to move the stable value fund to a new provider where the Committee on Uniform Security Identification Procedures (CUSIP) was attached to the TPA," said Ary Rosenbaum, an attorney with Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C. "In that stable value fund, this restriction was added because the producing TPA received an extra 25 basis points in fees. There are also termination costs that some TPAs don't spell out."

And though it's not a fee, Bogert said one troubling trend with 401(k) plans is this: Depending on the type of investment the participant has chosen, the money manager may have actually frozen the assets in a fund or investment. "I have seen this happen over the past three years with the market meltdown," Bogert said. They may totally freeze withdrawals for a period of time or limit the withdrawals to a percentage in the fund over a period of time. If a plan participant has money in a fixed account this can happen too."